On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 08:06 +0000, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 07:47:02AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 07:41 +0000, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 02:22:15PM -0800, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 16:42 -0500, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 19:35 +0000, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:26:13PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> > > > > > > index 65215ab..49f8e83 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> > > > > > > @@ -28,7 +28,10 @@ pgtable_t pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > > > > > unsigned long address)
> > > > > > > struct page *pte;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHPTE
> > > > > > > - pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_HIGHMEM, 0);
> > > > > > > + if (is_xen_domain())
> > > > > > > + pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> > > > > > > + else
> > > > > > > + pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP | __GFP_HIGHMEM, 0);
> > > > > > > #else
> > > > > > > pte = alloc_pages(PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> > > > > > > #endif
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I just tried this patch, but it fails to compile:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c: In function 'pte_alloc_one':
> > > > > > arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c:19: error: implicit declaration of function
> > > > > > 'is_xen_domain'
> > > > > > make[2]: *** [arch/x86/mm/pgtable.o] Error 1
> > > > > > make[1]: *** [arch/x86/mm] Error 2
> > > > > > make: *** [arch/x86] Error 2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I tried grepping around for that function but didn't find it from
> > > > > > any header..
> > > > >
> > > > > IIRC on some kernels it was called just xen_domain(), I'm not sure
> > > > > but I
> > > > > think my patch was against plain 2.6.32. I think the function
> > > > > (whatever
> > > > > it is called) also moved around in the headers recently.
> > > >
> > > > is_running_on_xen()
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'm using kernel.org 2.6.32.7, and I can't find is_running_on_xen()
> > > either.
> >
> > 2.6.32.7 has xen_domain() defined in include/xen/xen.h. Probably
> > xen_pv_domain() is the correct check though.
> >
>
> # grep xen_domain include/xen/xen.h
> grep: include/xen/xen.h: No such file or directory
>
> # grep xen_domain include/xen/interface/xen.h
> typedef uint8_t xen_domain_handle_t[16];
>
> # ls include/xen
> events.h features.h hvc-console.h Kbuild xenbus.h xen-ops.h
> evtchn.h grant_table.h interface page.h xencomm.h
>
> # grep xen_domain include/xen/*
> #
>
> # grep xen_domain include/xen/interface/*
> include/xen/interface/xen.h:typedef uint8_t xen_domain_handle_t[16];
> #
Ah, my 2.6.32.7 was actually 2.6.32.7 + Jeremy's next branch which has
the headfile move I mentioend earlier whereas plain 2.6.32.7 does not.
# git grep xen_domain_type v2.6.32.7 arch/x86/xen arch/x86/include/asm
v2.6.32.7:arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h:enum xen_domain_type {
v2.6.32.7:arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h:extern enum xen_domain_type
xen_domain_type;
v2.6.32.7:arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h:#define xen_domain_type
XEN_NATIVE
v2.6.32.7:arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h:#define xen_domain()
(xen_domain_type != XEN_NATIVE)
v2.6.32.7:arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h:
xen_domain_type == XEN_PV_DOMAIN)
v2.6.32.7:arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h:
xen_domain_type == XEN_HVM_DOMAIN)
v2.6.32.7:arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:enum xen_domain_type xen_domain_type =
XEN_NATIVE;
v2.6.32.7:arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_domain_type);
v2.6.32.7:arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c: xen_domain_type = XEN_PV_DOMAIN;
so it looks like you need xen_(|pv_)domain() and asm/xen/hypervisor.h
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home