| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] cleanup for __start_xen()
On 01/12/2009 09:42, "Tim Deegan" <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At 01:16 +0000 on 01 Dec (1259630197), Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> e is moved in [e-(modules_length+modules_headroom), e] range,
>> so, s is not overrun e too...
>
> OK, but:
> - this is not obvious (hence this thread);
> - even Keir makes mistakes here from time to time; and
> - it's a single test on code that runs at start of day
> so maybe we should just leave it as it was?
I'll put it back and fix my other pre-existing mistake also.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home