|   xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] Xen-side netchannel2 patches, take two 
| To: | Steven Smith <steven.smith@xxxxxxxxxx> |  
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] Xen-side netchannel2 patches, take two |  
| From: | Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> |  
| Date: | Thu, 8 Oct 2009 11:07:37 +0300 |  
| Cc: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	"joserenato.santos@xxxxxx" <joserenato.santos@xxxxxx>,	"JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Steven Smith <Steven.Smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |  
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:07:55 -0700 |  
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |  
| In-reply-to: | <20091007192108.GA10654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |  
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |  
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |  
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |  
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |  
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |  
| References: | <patchbomb.1254843342@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<20091006202840.GQ1434@xxxxxxxxxxx>	<4FA716B1526C7C4DB0375C6DADBC4EA342A68E5C79@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<20091007192108.GA10654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |  
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |  
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |  
| On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 08:21:08PM +0100, Steven Smith wrote:
> > > > This patch series includes all of the Xen and tools bits of
> > > > netchannel2.  It's essentially similar to the one I posted on Sunday,
> > > > except:
> > > >
> > > > -- I've dropped the unmodified drivers support.  It'd probably be
> > > >    fairly straightforward to re-introduce it, but it's not clear that
> > > >    anyone's actually using unmodified drivers any more (they don't
> > > >    even build against a 2.6.27 kernel, for instance).
> > > 
> > > At least Redhat/Fedora guys have been thinking of shipping pv-on-hvm Xen
> > > drivers for Fedora 12 / RHEL6.. But I don't know what's the status of
> > > that.
> > Yes, this certainly isn't a feature we want to drop. In fact, it
> > would be good to see the pv-on-hvm drivers modified to use some of
> > the pvops functions where available.
> Okay.  If this is something which we want to keep working in the
> future then it might be a good idea to sanify the build system a bit.
> The current approach is an unholy mixture of 2.6.18, the host kernel,
> and whatever kernel you're grabbing the actual drivers from, and is
> basically just asking for trouble.
> 
Hmm.. Did Novell guys port/fix the unmodified drivers to SLES11 (2.6.27) ?
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 8] Optimize memcpy for x86 arch. If source	buffers does not start at a 64, (continued)
 |  |  |