|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #20125 & Xen0: #16529..
Keir,
For the bug 1500, it should be introduced by #Cset 20084. In vlapic_ipi, the
variable dest_mode is casted to uint8_t from int when call vlapic_match_dest,
but dest_mode field is the 11th bit in icr_low register. Therefore, when call
vlapic_match_dest, dest_mode fields is always 0 due to the typecast, so when
guest processors generate IPIs with logical destination mode, the target
processors can't receive them because of wrong destination mode. Dongxiao had
a simple fix for that, but from the long run, we may need to cleanup the
related logic and removed the misleading variables in the corresponding
functions. What's your opinion ?
Xiantao
Xu, Jiajun wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is our bi-weekly test report for Xen-unstable tree. There are 8
> new bugs found this two weeks, including 3 P1 bugs. SR-IOV can not
> work in pv-ops Dom0. PAE guest is found can not boot with 4 vcpus.
> And some platform is found fail to do Dom0 S3 with pv-ops.
>
> New Bugs (8):
> =====================================================================
> 1. VF can not be enabled in pv-ops dom0
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1499
> 2. Pae smp guest boot up hang at "Brought up 4 CPUS".
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1500
> 3. Dom0 S3 will cause system reboot on Xeon 5400
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1501
> 4. [VT-d] Winxp guest does not recognize the hot-add NIC on Nehalem-EP
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1498
> 5. [vt-d]Guest print repeated characters using assigned USB keyboard
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1502
> 6. [vt-d]the assigned USB device does not work when hot-plug the real
> device
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1503
> 7. [vt-d]USB mouse/keyboard device has poor performance in guest
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1504
> 8. [vt-d]USB EHCI can not be assign to guest
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1505
>
>
> Old P1 Bugs (3):
> =====================================================================
> 1. stubdom based guest hangs at starting when using qcow image.
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1372
> 2. Linux guest boots up very slow with SDL rendering
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1478
> 3. [vt-d]when assign 82557 NIC to HVM, HVM hang
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1493
>
> Old P2 Bugs (8)
> =====================================================================
> 1. Live migration clobbers VM filesystem
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1494
> 2. T state control failed
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1451
> 3. Failed to install FC10
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1461
> 4. Two onboard 82576 NICs assigned to HVM guest cannot work stable if
> use INTx interrupt.
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1459
> 5. E1000e NIC failed in FC10 guest
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1458
> 6. stubdom based guest hangs when assigning hdc to it.
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
> 7. [stubdom]The xm save command hangs while saving <Domain-dm>.
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1377
> 8. [stubdom] cannot restore stubdom based domain.
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1378
>
>
> Xen Info:
> ============================================================================
> xen-changeset: 20125:ed672a604cc7
>
> pvops git:
> commit 16529fc075a95a84901842f7353ac906cd912bba
> Merge: 5d78a20... 3186c67...
> Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ioemu git:
> commit a83d119cfcc20bc7edb427992d6e31b3e99430be
> Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon Aug 10 18:02:56 2009 +0100
>
> Test Environment:
> ==========================================================================
> Service OS : Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.1 (Tikanga)
> Hardware : Stoakley
>
> 32e Summary Test Report of Last Session
> =====================================================================
> Total Pass Fail NoResult Crash
> =====================================================================
> vtd 6 4 2 0 0
> control_panel 14 10 4 0 0
> ras 1 1 0 0 0
> gtest 22 16 6 0 0
> =====================================================================
> vtd 6 4 2 0 0
> :one_pcie_up_nomsi_64_g3 1 1 0 0 0
> :two_dev_up_xp_nomsi_64_ 1 0 1 0 0
> :one_pcie_up_vista_nomsi 1 0 1 0 0
> :lm_pcie_up_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> :hp_pcie_up_nomsi_64_g32 1 1 0 0 0
> :lm_pcie_up_xp_nomsi_64_ 1 1 0 0 0
> control_panel 14 10 4 0 0
> :XEN_1500M_guest_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_256M_guest_64_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_256M_xenu_64_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_LM_Continuity_64_g3 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_LM_SMP_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_Nevada_xenu_64_g32e 1 0 1 0 0
> :XEN_vmx_vcpu_pin_64_g32 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_linux_win_64_g32e 1 0 1 0 0
> :XEN_SR_Continuity_64_g3 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_vmx_2vcpu_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_1500M_guest_64_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_two_winxp_64_g32e 1 0 1 0 0
> :XEN_256M_guest_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_SR_SMP_64_g32e 1 0 1 0 0
> ras 1 1 0 0 0
> :cpu_online_offline_64_g 1 1 0 0 0
> gtest 22 16 6 0 0
> :boot_up_noacpi_win2k_64 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_up_acpi_win2k_64_g 1 1 0 0 0
> :reboot_xp_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_solaris10u5_64_g32 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_up_vista_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_indiana_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_up_acpi_xp_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_smp_acpi_xp_64_g32 1 0 1 0 0
> :boot_up_acpi_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_up_win2008_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_base_kernel_64_g32 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_up_acpi_win2k3_64_ 1 1 0 0 0
> :kb_nightly_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_nevada_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> :ltp_nightly_64_g32e 1 0 1 0 0
> :boot_fc9_64_g32e 1 0 1 0 0
> :boot_smp_vista_64_g32e 1 0 1 0 0
> :boot_smp_win2008_64_g32 1 0 1 0 0
> :boot_smp_acpi_win2k3_64 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_rhel5u1_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_smp_acpi_win2k_64_ 1 0 1 0 0
> :reboot_fc6_64_g32e 1 1 0 0 0
> =====================================================================
> Total 43 31 12 0 0
>
>
> pae Summary Test Report of Last Session
> =====================================================================
> Total Pass Fail NoResult Crash
> =====================================================================
> vtd 5 3 2 0 0
> control_panel 10 7 3 0 0
> ras 1 1 0 0 0
> gtest 24 17 7 0 0
> =====================================================================
> vtd 5 3 2 0 0
> :two_dev_up_xp_nomsi_PAE 1 0 1 0 0
> :hp_pcie_up_nomsi_PAE_gP 1 1 0 0 0
> :one_pcie_up_nomsi_PAE_g 1 1 0 0 0
> :one_pcie_up_vista_nomsi 1 0 1 0 0
> :lm_pcie_up_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> control_panel 10 7 3 0 0
> :XEN_linux_win_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_SR_SMP_PAE_gPAE 1 0 1 0 0
> :XEN_LM_SMP_PAE_gPAE 1 0 1 0 0
> :XEN_SR_Continuity_PAE_g 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_vmx_vcpu_pin_PAE_gP 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_LM_Continuity_PAE_g 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_256M_guest_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_two_winxp_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_1500M_guest_PAE_gPA 1 1 0 0 0
> :XEN_vmx_2vcpu_PAE_gPAE 1 0 1 0 0
> ras 1 1 0 0 0
> :cpu_online_offline_PAE_ 1 1 0 0 0
> gtest 24 17 7 0 0
> :ltp_nightly_PAE_gPAE 1 0 1 0 0
> :boot_up_acpi_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> :reboot_xp_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_up_acpi_xp_PAE_gPA 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_up_vista_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_fc9_PAE_gPAE 1 0 1 0 0
> :boot_up_acpi_win2k3_PAE 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_smp_acpi_win2k3_PA 1 0 1 0 0
> :boot_smp_acpi_win2k_PAE 1 0 1 0 0
> :boot_up_acpi_win2k_PAE_ 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_smp_acpi_xp_PAE_gP 1 0 1 0 0
> :boot_up_noacpi_win2k_PA 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_smp_vista_PAE_gPAE 1 0 1 0 0
> :boot_up_noacpi_win2k3_P 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_nevada_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_rhel5u1_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_indiana_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_solaris10u5_PAE_gP 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_base_kernel_PAE_gP 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_up_win2008_PAE_gPA 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_up_noacpi_xp_PAE_g 1 1 0 0 0
> :boot_smp_win2008_PAE_gP 1 0 1 0 0
> :reboot_fc6_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> :kb_nightly_PAE_gPAE 1 1 0 0 0
> =====================================================================
> Total 40 28 12 0 0
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Jiajun
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|