|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/numa: fix c/s 20120 (Fix SRAT check for disconti
That change converted the (wrong) assumption of contiguous nodes'
memory to a similarly wrong one of assuming discontiguous memory (i.e.
each node having separate E820 table entries). The code ought to be
able to deal with both, though, and I hope this change makes it so.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
--- 2009-08-24.orig/xen/arch/x86/srat.c 2009-08-28 00:00:00.000000000 +0200
+++ 2009-08-24/xen/arch/x86/srat.c 2009-08-28 12:12:40.000000000 +0200
@@ -249,15 +249,23 @@ static int nodes_cover_memory(void)
start = e820.map[i].addr;
end = e820.map[i].addr + e820.map[i].size - 1;
- found = 0;
- for_each_node_mask(j, nodes_parsed) {
- if (start >= nodes[j].start && end <= nodes[j].end) {
- found = 1;
- break;
- }
- }
+ do {
+ found = 0;
+ for_each_node_mask(j, nodes_parsed)
+ if (start < nodes[j].end
+ && end > nodes[j].start) {
+ if (start >= nodes[j].start) {
+ start = nodes[j].end;
+ found = 1;
+ }
+ if (end <= nodes[j].end) {
+ end = nodes[j].start;
+ found = 1;
+ }
+ }
+ } while (found && start < end);
- if (!found) {
+ if (start < end) {
printk(KERN_ERR "SRAT: No PXM for e820 range: "
"%016Lx - %016Lx\n", start, end);
return 0;
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/numa: fix c/s 20120 (Fix SRAT check for discontig memory),
Jan Beulich <=
|
|
|
|
|