|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/1] XEN: enlighten, use uninitialized_var(cx)
To: |
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/1] XEN: enlighten, use uninitialized_var(cx) |
From: |
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:27:15 -0700 |
Cc: |
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:28:41 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<20090826060925.GA6194@xxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<1251234044-6943-1-git-send-email-jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx> <20090826060925.GA6194@xxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2 |
On 08/25/2009 11:09 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> index e90540a..5ab75e2 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static void xen_cpuid(unsigned int *ax, unsigned int *bx,
>>
>> static __init void xen_init_cpuid_mask(void)
>> {
>> - unsigned int ax, bx, cx, dx;
>> + unsigned int ax, bx, uninitialized_var(cx), dx;
>
> Please dont use uninitialized_var(), it's an unreliable facility: if
> this variable ever grows a real used-without-initialization bug in
> the future, the compiler warning is turned off permanently. It's
> rare but might happen. We are better off with initializing it to
> zero.
>
I hadn't seen this thread, but I pushed a patch to x86/urgent to do
exactly that while I was committing the Xen crash patch last night.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|