WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [pv_ops domU] 2.6.30.5 - unable to handle kernel pag

To: Jed Smith <jsmith@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [pv_ops domU] 2.6.30.5 - unable to handle kernel paging request / refresh_cpu_vm_stats / vmstat_update
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:20:52 -0700
Cc: xen devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:26:33 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A8EB5CD.6070706@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4A89F539.2070801@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A8A2E74.9010202@xxxxxxxx> <4A8AB7B8.4070905@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A8B0BD2.2060304@xxxxxxxx> <4A8D9FC7.7070101@xxxxxxxxxx> <4A8DDCEF.9020303@xxxxxxxx> <4A8DE6B7.7060001@xxxxxxxxxx> <4A8DEC9C.50207@xxxxxxxx> <4A8EB5CD.6070706@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b3
On 08/21/09 07:57, Jed Smith wrote:
> I have a Linode under 3.2.1-rc5, and you're more than welcome to use it
> (I've been reproducing with pv-grub under that hypervisor).  Do you want
> credentials to give it a whirl?

Well, to be honest, I can't say I can get very excited about tracking
down where a bug *disappeared*.  Do you have a strong need to support
current kernels on old versions of Xen, or would it be simpler to update
Xen?

(Though I suspect that PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS may be the explanation in this
case, assuming you have them enabled.)

    J


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>