|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Enlarge default NR_CPUS to 64 for x86_64
I think there's little point in having both have the same limit. I'd rather
question whether the limit shouldn't be pushed up higher for x86-64.
Jan
>>> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 07.08.09 11:52 >>>
Shall we just bump it for i386 too?
-- Keir
On 07/08/2009 10:37, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> By far a lot of systems are with more sockets (>=4), more cores (>=8),
> meanwhile with HyperThread, so enlarge the default NR_CPUS would easier the
> build for more threads systems.
>
> Jimmy
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Enlarge default NR_CPUS to 64 for x86_64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Gang <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff -r b9cdcf502aa3 xen/include/asm-x86/config.h
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/config.h Thu Aug 06 11:14:48 2009 +0100
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/config.h Fri Aug 07 14:54:06 2009 +0800
> @@ -49,7 +49,11 @@
> #ifdef MAX_PHYS_CPUS
> #define NR_CPUS MAX_PHYS_CPUS
> #else
> +#ifdef __i386__
> #define NR_CPUS 32
> +#else
> +#define NR_CPUS 64
> +#endif
> #endif
>
> #ifdef __i386__
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|