[Xen-devel][PATCH] To use common p2m ops in common p2m code path

To:	Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel][PATCH] To use common p2m ops in common p2m code path
From:	"Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:18:11 +0800
Accept-language:	en-US
Acceptlanguage:	en-US
Delivery-date:	Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:19:44 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcoXP/wL5Y/Uir7uRSS11t2fA6gNzA==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel][PATCH] To use common p2m ops in common p2m code path

We found recently there was an assertion failure when EPT mode is enabled on 32PAE host when “debug=y” is used.

The patch attached fixes that. It uses the common p2m ops in the common p2m code path “p2m_remove_page” rather than calling p2m_gfn_to_mfn() for only shadow mode.

Signed-off-by: Xin, Xiaohui xiaohui.xin@xxxxxxxxx

assert-fix.diff
Description: assert-fix.diff

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel][PATCH] To use common p2m ops in common p2m code path