WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Future of xenbits Linux trees

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Future of xenbits Linux trees
From: Andy Burns <xen.lists@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 19:52:18 +0100
Cc: Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 11:52:48 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kw3i2lVTZUTRdnrZeTLOP2XCBjYjlm9HytVy9kuq4/M=; b=jehqz7hRLv5ufJa+hgU/bkiD5y7hf+wNgB+cvtMqe3nT+hsBjjMzzCjqAlQPZrCsnK +EeqELXxMT9vy6F2jV+8unUK+Sm0CWcG+aGWvJjaDnale/kVtPvKEvT0Go4ERfRubRS1 FHUlpgdf9rAf08LlQaSMD2OUC5GMc3os88qBc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=x0o1aws17YmehlgywxGZuzH/CCNiuXGe01mRVeiKlr55/lX+cKYQEb6zTugny5SQWv OYVle+Q3mxvc/WORDo8RZHsCE9Waeb+OMnzDdke0eExhxdEC9A+WQSysAHg5O0Tzy4z2 Q0YNllZqhcGtQ0N+YwiQpLQeFHicIFxdNSFH0=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090607170954.GE24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C64DAAA6.788E%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f4527be0906050032g3a467aa9wfec5cd20a7f62c70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <b4057d410906051151q7e3db991w8a79a13cf17e2469@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090607170954.GE24960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
2009/6/7 Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>:

> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 07:51:44PM +0100, Andy Burns wrote:
>>
>> did I hear that it's likely RHEL6/CentOS6 will
>> be 2.6.27 based?
>
> Where did you hear that?

On a mailing list somewhere, but I couldn't find it to post a
reference, I've just had another look and I still can't find it,
perhaps I was mistaken.

> I don't have any facts, but I'd _assume_ RHEL6 will have 2.6.29 or 2.6.30 ..

Actually I can see plenty of hints that RHEL6 will be ~2.6.30, so if
RH plans on having dom0 in RHEL6 then building some form of
"out-of-tree" coalition around 2.6.30+pvops patches would be nice, and
maybe dom0 will be accepted into mainstream before ~2.6.42 when RHEL7
gets frozen ;-)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel