Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] introduce __must_be_array

To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] introduce __must_be_array
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 20 May 2009 06:15:53 -0700
Cc:
Delivery-date:	Wed, 20 May 2009 06:16:30 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4A141BFB0200007800001C73@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcnZS5At0yNWRsEtRNCkR/Y0ePrO/wAAYnnf
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH] introduce __must_be_array
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/12.17.0.090302

On 20/05/2009 06:04, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Cloning the similar construct from Linux, allowing to detect improper
> uses of ARRAY_SIZE() at build time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>

Would simply removing the cast to void from BUILD_BUG_ON() lead to compiler
warnings?

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] introduce __must_be_array