ocaml?? why?? (was: [Xen-devel] caml stubdom crashes)

At the recent summit, I know I wasn't the only one concerned
about the rise of ocaml as a critical language/tool in the
Xen development world, but I guess I'll be the sacrificial
lamb that starts the discussion, prompted by the thread
about stubdom crashes.

Why ocaml?  Let me make it clear that I know very little
about ocaml... it may be a perfect match for the job and
the best language since sliced bread, but as far as I can
tell it is NOT A WIDELY DEPLOYED language.  As a result,
the Xen community is going to have to work through all
of the little distro/version-dependent idiosyncracies and
bugs that are long since worked through in many other
languages.  That scares me.  I'm happy to learn a new
language... I'm NOT happy to learn how to debug a new
compiler/runtime.

In other words, it may be a very fine academic/research
language... but do we really want enterprise customers'
critical workloads dependent on it?

Okay, the elephant/camel is on the table.  Commence firing.

Dan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] vncconsole vs vncviewer, videoram vs vram, Beng Heng Ng

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] Re: [patch 0/6] Guest page hinting version 7., Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] caml stubdom crashes, George S. Coker, II

Next by Thread:

Re: ocaml?? why?? (was: [Xen-devel] caml stubdom crashes), Samuel Thibault

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]