| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] memory_reservation bug?: memory holes
On 03/11/09 11:08, Keir Fraser wrote:
Just because you called decrease_reservation() doesn't mean the pages
necessarily really got freed. If you still have mappings to them squirrelled
away then the free can be deferred.
A related question. I assume it is ok to have holes in the physical
memory, i.e. call decrease_reservation with a range << max_pfn. In this
case, what are the rules for the value in the P2M table? Does Xen zero
out the slot or is it the guest's responsibility? save/restore must be
able to determine that a hole exists.
Mick
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home