Hi Keir,
Please apply the attached patch again...
p2m_is_ram is better than mfn_valid:)
Su, Disheng wrote:
> Hi Keir/Dexuan,
> Attached the patch, which only checks the conflict in RAM range.
> Keir Fraser wrote:
>> On 23/10/08 11:24, "Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Keir Fraser wrote:
>>>> Well, one approach would be not to warn! :-)
>>>>
>>>> Seriously: for anything which is not guest RAM, the host should
>>>> really know best what memory type it should be mapped as (probably
>>>> UC or WC). Hence why mess around validating a guest-requested
>>>> memory type?
>>> This method looks good. I'll try to make a patch.
>>
>> Thanks. I agree this is probably the best approach.
>>
>> -- Keir
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Disheng, Su
Best Regards,
Disheng, Su
check_ram_address_only.patch
Description: check_ram_address_only.patch
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home