Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] x86: add FIX_HOLE

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If no explanation can be given as to why this makes the highmem-assist patch
work, I can only reasonably take neither patch.

 -- Keir

On 27/10/08 11:38, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I have to admit that I don't recall the exact details of where I ran
> into a problem without this change, but it's a prerequisite for the
> highmem-assist patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Index: 2008-09-19/xen/include/asm-x86/fixmap.h
> ===================================================================
> --- 2008-09-19.orig/xen/include/asm-x86/fixmap.h 2008-09-15 11:25:43.000000000
> +0200
> +++ 2008-09-19/xen/include/asm-x86/fixmap.h 2008-09-19 14:00:01.000000000
> +0200
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>   * from the end of virtual memory backwards.
>   */
>  enum fixed_addresses {
> +    FIX_HOLE,
>  #ifdef __i386__
>      FIX_PAE_HIGHMEM_0,
>      FIX_PAE_HIGHMEM_END = FIX_PAE_HIGHMEM_0 + NR_CPUS-1,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel