WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/Makefile: use CC --version instead of -v

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/Makefile: use CC --version instead of -v
From: Robert Buchholz <rbu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:06:41 +0200
Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 04:07:22 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C4DAF25F.267BE%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C4DAF25F.267BE%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.9
On Wednesday 27 August 2008, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 27/8/08 11:33, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 27/8/08 11:12, "Robert Buchholz" <rbu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Btw, what is the reason for ".*" in the first place?
> >
> > Lost somewhat in the mists of time, but I think some vendor
> > packages (possibly Red Hat iirc) stuck something in between 'gcc'
> > and 'version'.
> >
> > Another tactic might be 'tail -n1'. I can't remember if the version
> > is always the last line of 'gcc -v' output though.
> >
> > Hmmm... actually that is what Linux does (tail -n 1). So let's go
> > with that.
>
> I've checked in 'tail -1' which I think is more portable. If that is
> agreeable to everyone then I'll backport to 3.3 and 3.2 branches.

Thanks, backports are appreciated (and trivial).


Robert

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel