Hi,
The ptaches you are using are very old, so I can't remember detail about
them. Only I can say is:
- "Attach" operation is needed in order to attach specfied HBA to
guest domain. (To do so, some information should be wriiten to
xenstore. However, these patches did not contain tool to do it,
meybe, because the patches were just for RFC.)
- After that operation, you can see SCSI disks under the HBA as
/dev/sd?? on the guest domain.
- If you can successfully see the disks, you can see any information
about FC transport layer at /sys/class/*.
Best regards,
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:09:05 +0530
Tej <bewith.tej@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Jun Kamada <kama@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Tej-san Mark-san and all,
> >
> > Unfortunately, the pvSCSI driver for Xen 3.3 does not support FC
> > transport layer functionality. I consider that at least new export
> > mode, which exports whole physical SCSI tree under a HBA to guest
> > domain, is needed. (FC transport functionality assumes physical
> > topology, I think.)
> Actually i am still at compilation and building stage of xen 3.3 and
> will get back on this.
> Currently we are using the patches indicated in my previous post. i
> could get the following.
> 1. I am able to access and see all the disk on SAN in dom0 i.e. cat
> /proc/scsi/scsi list all the disk.
> 2. domU could not able to see that FC HBA driver itself, i will try
> with directly assigning the PCI device to domU (HTH)
> Front-back arch. could not be the culprit because this arch. is
> applicable to dom0 also.
>
> so what i am missing?
>
> thanks
> -tej
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 09:07:25 +0530
> > Tej <bewith.tej@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Mark Williamson
> >> <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Actually, the PVSCSI *was* mentioned in the 3.3 release announcement so I
> >> > think you should find it there...
> >>
> >> yaa i was looking at 3.3 release notes, but i couldn't relate PVSCSCI to it
> >> thanks for this pointers
> >>
> >> >
> >> > The header file seems not to have made its way into
> >> > xen/include/public/io/
> >> > along with the other front/back interface definitions. It is in the
> >> > XenLinux
> >> > copy of that directory, though, which I hadn't checked.
> >> >
> >> > 3.3 is probably worth looking at, then ;-)
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Mark
> >> >
> >> > On Saturday 23 August 2008, Tej wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Mark Williamson
> >> >>
> >> >> <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >> > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Tej wrote:
> >> >> >> Hi All
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> As i was referring to the following link
> >> >> >> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-06/msg00996.html
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> but i can't see this work in official xen 3.2.
> >> >> >> Is it still in review?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I think I've seen activing reviewing of this patch set fairly
> >> >> > recently so
> >> >> > presumably it's still being worked on. It doesn't look like it's
> >> >> > made it
> >> >> > into 3.3, so I guess 3.4 would be the soonest we'd expect it...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Or can i use the same patches to perform some NPIV task.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If you're willing to try experimental software you could probably
> >> >> > patch
> >> >> > the code yourself - you might need to be prepared to do some merging
> >> >> > in
> >> >> > places if the Xen tree has diverged from the state that the patches
> >> >> > expect...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You should try to make sure you have the most recent patches possible
> >> >> > -
> >> >> > I'm sure they've been updated several times since the mailing list
> >> >> > post
> >> >> > that you found.
> >> >>
> >> >> thanks, i will go ahead with the solution.
> >> >>
> >> >> > Cheers,
> >> >> > Mark
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> thanks in advance for any help
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -TEJ
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool
> >> >> > (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool
> >> > (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
> >> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Xen-devel mailing list
> >> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >
> >
> > -----
> > Jun Kamada
> >
> >
> >
-----
Jun Kamada
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|