|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions
On 11/8/08 13:22, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Yes, this is true. We could easily do something better for VCPUs polling a
>> single event channel though, but there hasn't been a need up to now. I
>> suppose it depends how often we have multiple VCPUs stuck waiting for
>> spinlocks. I can sort out a Xen-side patch if someone wanted to measure the
>> benefits from more selective wakeup from poll.
>
> Running kernel builds on 8 vCPU-s competing for 4 pCPU-s shows a 10%
> improvement in performance with the individual wakeup (patch attached
> - probably sub-optimal, but I didn't seem to be able to think of a lock-less
> mechanism to achieve the desired behavior), using ticket locks in the
> kernel.
Hardly a real-world benchmark. :-)
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jan Beulich
|
|
|
|
|