WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?

To: Ward Vandewege <ward@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:49:13 +0100
Cc:
Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 06:49:41 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080807131255.GA29124@localdomain>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acj4lGAHnmTg9mSHEd27qQAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122
On 7/8/08 14:12, "Ward Vandewege" <ward@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm using the latest version of kexec (2.0.0 from
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/horms/kexec-tools/), but I've
> also tested older kexec versions which behave in the same way.
> 
> I first observed this on real iron, but I've now set up a test environment
> with qemu which behaves identically.
> 
> Any suggestions?

Try adding no-real-mode to Xen's command line.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel