xen-devel
[Xen-devel] [patch] x86: paravirt spinlocks, !CONFIG_SMP build fixes (wa
To: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] [patch] x86: paravirt spinlocks, !CONFIG_SMP build fixes (was: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks) |
From: |
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:35:03 +0200 |
Cc: |
Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@xxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Friebel <thomas.friebel@xxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:35:46 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<20080709122852.GA30579@xxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<20080707190749.299430659@xxxxxxxx> <20080709122852.GA30579@xxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> as there were no fundamental objections in this thread i've created a
> tip/x86/paravirt-spinlocks topic branch for these patches and started
> testing them.
small UP build fixes below.
Ingo
----------------->
commit c77bc635bb0486b0ddbe03012a8662b399ae9cdb
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Jul 9 14:33:33 2008 +0200
x86: paravirt spinlocks, !CONFIG_SMP build fixes
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
index bba4041..6aa8aed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
@@ -270,11 +270,13 @@ enum paravirt_lazy_mode paravirt_get_lazy_mode(void)
void __init paravirt_use_bytelocks(void)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
pv_lock_ops.spin_is_locked = __byte_spin_is_locked;
pv_lock_ops.spin_is_contended = __byte_spin_is_contended;
pv_lock_ops.spin_lock = __byte_spin_lock;
pv_lock_ops.spin_trylock = __byte_spin_trylock;
pv_lock_ops.spin_unlock = __byte_spin_unlock;
+#endif
}
struct pv_info pv_info = {
@@ -461,12 +463,14 @@ struct pv_mmu_ops pv_mmu_ops = {
};
struct pv_lock_ops pv_lock_ops = {
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
.spin_is_locked = __ticket_spin_is_locked,
.spin_is_contended = __ticket_spin_is_contended,
.spin_lock = __ticket_spin_lock,
.spin_trylock = __ticket_spin_trylock,
.spin_unlock = __ticket_spin_unlock,
+#endif
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pv_time_ops);
diff --git a/include/asm-x86/paravirt.h b/include/asm-x86/paravirt.h
index 65ed02c..b2aba8f 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/paravirt.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/paravirt.h
@@ -1387,6 +1387,8 @@ void _paravirt_nop(void);
void paravirt_use_bytelocks(void);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+
static inline int __raw_spin_is_locked(struct raw_spinlock *lock)
{
return PVOP_CALL1(int, pv_lock_ops.spin_is_locked, lock);
@@ -1412,6 +1414,8 @@ static __always_inline void __raw_spin_unlock(struct
raw_spinlock *lock)
return PVOP_VCALL1(pv_lock_ops.spin_unlock, lock);
}
+#endif
+
/* These all sit in the .parainstructions section to tell us what to patch. */
struct paravirt_patch_site {
u8 *instr; /* original instructions */
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|