| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit
|
To: |
Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support |
|
From: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:14:00 -0700 |
|
Cc: |
Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>, Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Tweedie <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:14:26 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<20080701092152.GA18918@xxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<20080626105818.GA13805@xxxxxxx> <4863A8E6.1010807@xxxxxxxx> <20080627160333.GA27072@xxxxxxx> <486539A3.3030102@xxxxxxxx> <20080629084318.GA28815@xxxxxxx> <48684CD4.7040403@xxxxxxxx> <20080630082135.GA22844@xxxxxxx> <20080630092209.GA29815@xxxxxxx> <48696690.90907@xxxxxxxx> <20080701085204.GA23289@xxxxxxx> <20080701092152.GA18918@xxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) |
Ingo Molnar wrote:
Excluding the x86/xen-64bit topic solves the problem.
It triggered on two 64-bit machines so it seems readily reproducible
with that config.
i've pushed the failing tree out to tip/tmp.xen-64bit.Tue_Jul__1_10_55
The patch to fix this is on tip/x86/unify-setup: "x86: setup_arch() &&
early_ioremap_init()". Logically that patch should probably be in the
xen64 branch, since it's only meaningful with the early_ioremap unification.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Ingo Molnar
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Yinghai Lu
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Yinghai Lu
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Yinghai Lu
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Yinghai Lu
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support, Yinghai Lu
|
|
|
| |
|
Home