| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Finer access control framework over users, domains and o
Syunsuke HAYASHI writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Finer access control framework over
users, domains and operations."):
> We understand that the implementation of the ACM on the web layer is easy.
> But we think that basic control tools of Xen (xm and libvirt) also need
> the ACM
I see. Why ?
> It is necessary to realize the ACM which considers users, domains and
> operations.
> We only know ways that control by the unit of users or processes.
> Please let us know if there are other tools or ways that realize the ACM.
I'm not sure what you mean by `realise the ACM'. Earlier you said
`ACM' stood for `Access Control Module' which I'll take to assume
means just some kind of access control facility. I assume `realise'
means `have.
So you seem to be saying that you need an access control facility that
`considers users, domains and operations'. That kind of access
control seems to be exactly what is easily done at a web ui layer, as
I said.
Perhaps `Access Control Module' means something more specific. If so
then what kind of something ? And why do you need that rather than
another solution ?
It would be most helpful if you described your ultimate objectives, in
a solution-neutral way.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home