WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [patch]Add a new reboot method

To: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [patch]Add a new reboot method
From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:49:14 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Huacai Chen <huacai.chen@xxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 29 May 2008 05:03:36 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <483EA803.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903
References: <42DFA526FC41B1429CE7279EF83C6BDC01383B57@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080529112645.7dfbd32e@core> <483EA803.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> to be affected: Linux post 2.6.22 (iirc) fails to reboot my Dell Precision
> 490 correctly, I have to force it to use the CF9 method. I tried looking
> into the changes that got made in that area, but wasn't able to (spend
> enough time to) pin-point the problem so far.

You might want to boot a 32bit kernel and try acpi=off, if that does the
trick then its (another) ACPI bug and the cf9 is red herring ?

> But I also agree to you and Keir that blindly writing to a port is no good
> idea. It should at least be assured that hardware supports this.

Which takes us back to ACPI. If 0xcf9 is the correct process the ACPI
method should use it.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel