|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17630 & Xen0: #540 -- blocked
Xu, Dongxiao writes ("RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17630 &
> Xen0: #540 -- blocked"):
> In your new patch, if find_protocol() function returns NULL,
> then you will let drv = &bdrv_raw, it is just guessing the image to
> be raw, I remember you mentioned it as a security problem. So I
> don't find any difference as the following one, it just reverts the
> change in block.c in C/S 17606.
Yes, I did revert that specific change; it's dealt with by
find_protocol's caller, instead.
I've also tested that tap:qcow:/path/to/raw/image.iso does not work.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17630 & Xen0: #540 -- blocked, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17630 & Xen0: #540 -- blocked, Li, Haicheng
- RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17630 & Xen0: #540 -- blocked, Xu, Dongxiao
- Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17630 & Xen0: #540 -- blocked, Kevin Wolf
- RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17630 & Xen0: #540 -- blocked, Xu, Dongxiao
- Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17630 & Xen0: #540 -- blocked, Kevin Wolf
- Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17630 & Xen0: #540 -- blocked, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17630 & Xen0: #540 -- blocked, Kevin Wolf
- Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17630 & Xen0: #540 -- blocked, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17630 & Xen0: #540 -- blocked, Kevin Wolf
- RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17630 & Xen0: #540 -- blocked, Xu, Dongxiao
- RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17630 & Xen0: #540 -- blocked,
Ian Jackson <=
|
|
|
|
|