Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][QEMU] Fix HVM guest hang in save/restore

To:	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, SUZUKI Kazuhiro <kaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][QEMU] Fix HVM guest hang in save/restore with the network load
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 15 May 2008 17:34:57 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Thu, 15 May 2008 09:35:23 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<18476.25333.881714.504303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Aci2qZxq2wlR4CKcEd2XLwAWy6hiGQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH][QEMU] Fix HVM guest hang in save/restore with the network load
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122

On 15/5/08 17:21, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Is there some reason why we shouldn't do the same ?  If we did then
> that would make our code here identical to upstream's and avoid
> another needless point of divergence.
> 
> I assume that at this stage in xen-unstable we don't mind making a
> backward incompatible change to the saved image format ?
> 
> If there's no reason not to synch with qemu here I will make a patch.

Yes, we can change it, if the upstream version has equivalent behaviour.
Please send a patch.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][QEMU] Fix HVM guest hang in save/restore with th