|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3
To: |
"Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ke, Liping" <liping.ke@xxxxxxxxx>, "Yu, Ke" <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3 |
From: |
"Ian Pratt" <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Thu, 15 May 2008 13:42:28 +0100 |
Cc: |
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 15 May 2008 05:43:39 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<C451E257.20BDB%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<DD74FBB8EE28D441903D56487861CD9D2E6B9C14@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C451E257.20BDB%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
Aciwyj3GC5kFZyVcS9eJk6QW6cxy6gAO58GAAASSNxAAAQ9pEAAnjI9gAAQtZQAA9rPlAAAFlo6tABrTxrAADZF8SQAIt2zQAABHtIgAAZHZYA== |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3 |
> > In fact, does the S3 suspended guest need to go into a pause state
at
> > all? Presumably we could just let it block?
> > Xend does need to be able to know when the S3 suspend has actually
> > happened -- there should probably be a VIRQ for this.
>
> S3 suspend is enacted by an I/O port write from the guest, trapped by
> qemu,
> so the final reset of machine state is synchronously triggered by the
> tools
> anyway.
OK, as long as qemu-dm communicates this via xenstore.
> As for pause-vs-block I think this is just a matter of terminology. At
> the end of the day we want the domain to not run until s3-resume is
> triggered.
> The natural way to do this within the hypervisor is to maintain a per-
> domain is_s3_suspended flag and domain_[un]pause() when this flag
toggles.
We wouldn't need to do the pause if the code after the magic port write
did "cli;hlt". Does it do this or loop?
[On real hardware the effect of the port write wouldn't be immediate, so
it must do something]
Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Yu, Ke
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ke, Liping
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ke, Liping
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ke, Liping
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3,
Ian Pratt <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ke, Liping
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/4] HVM Virtual S3, Yu, Ke
|
|
|
|
|