|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make MSI-X work with 64-bit BARs
Thanks!
It is so silly of me to make such a mistake in my patch.
2008/5/14 Neil Turton <nturton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> The code for working out the base address of a 64-bit BAR currently puts
> the two halves together in the wrong order and leaves the type bits in
> the resulting value. It also treats PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 as an
> flag rather than an enumeration value. This patch fixes these issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Turton <nturton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> diff -r 810d8c3ac992 xen/arch/x86/msi.c
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/msi.c Thu May 08 16:58:33 2008 +0100
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/msi.c Wed May 14 13:44:34 2008 +0100
> @@ -521,17 +521,20 @@ static u64 pci_resource_start(struct pci
> static u64 pci_resource_start(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 bar_index)
> {
> u64 bar_base;
> + u32 reg_val;
> u8 bus = dev->bus;
> u8 slot = PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn);
> u8 func = PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn);
>
> - bar_base = pci_conf_read32(bus, slot, func,
> - PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 + 4 * bar_index);
> - if ( bar_base & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 )
> - {
> - bar_base <<= 32;
> - bar_base += pci_conf_read32(bus, slot, func,
> - PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 + 4 * (bar_index + 1));
> + reg_val = pci_conf_read32(bus, slot, func,
> + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 + 4 * bar_index);
> + bar_base = reg_val & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
> + if ( ( reg_val & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_MASK ) ==
> + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 )
> + {
> + reg_val = pci_conf_read32(bus, slot, func,
> + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0 + 4 * (bar_index + 1));
> + bar_base |= ((u64)reg_val) << 32;
> }
>
> return bar_base;
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|