|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table
To: |
"Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table |
From: |
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:40:01 +0100 |
Cc: |
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@xxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:40:32 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<08DF4D958216244799FC84F3514D70F00145BFB2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Mail-followup-to: |
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@xxxxxxxxx> |
References: |
<08DF4D958216244799FC84F3514D70F00145BF7A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C4336BAD.1FDBE%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <08DF4D958216244799FC84F3514D70F00145BFB2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Han, Weidong, le Tue 22 Apr 2008 17:34:11 +0800, a écrit :
> Separate VT-d page table is by default. Shared VT-d page table may be
> easy and good in some cases. So we let them co-exist now. If shared VT-d
> page table is not necessary and useless, we can remove it easily in
> future.
But why unsharing it at all? Is there any bonus except using more
memory? :)
Samuel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table, Han, Weidong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table, Han, Weidong
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table, Han, Weidong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table, Espen Skoglund
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table fromP2M table, Han, Weidong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table, Li, Xin B
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table,
Samuel Thibault <=
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [VTD] Separate VT-d page table from P2M table, Han, Weidong
|
|
|
|
|