Hi,
At 14:24 +0800 on 01 Feb (1201875864), Su, Disheng wrote:
> REPS prefix emulation for INS and OUTS is already in xen. Can we enable
> REPS for "stos" and "movs" in paging mode? Although it doesn't benefit a
> lot for normal hvm guest, in virtualpc case, I have to do that.
> VirtualPC will call "reps stos"(ecx=0x400, eax=0) a lot, about 1000
> times per second. It seems to clear a L1 page table page, it can't be
> fast unshadowed in check_for_early_unshadow and it's even ReadOnly in
> guest page table(CR0.wp = 0). So we get 0x400 * 1000 times page faults
> per second, so CPU cycle is almost wasted on it.
This patch looks fine to me; I'll let Keir decide whether the extra 200
lines or so of shadow/emulate code is worthwhile for running VPC under Xen.
Keir, even if we don't take this, please do take this hunk:
diff -r 05b3bdb3b7fa xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c Wed Jan 30 00:09:03 2008 +0800
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c Wed Jan 30 00:09:04 2008 +0800
@@ -4076,8 +4091,8 @@ static void *emulate_map_dest(struct vcp
sh_ctxt->mfn2 = emulate_gva_to_mfn(v, (vaddr + bytes - 1) & PAGE_MASK,
sh_ctxt);
if ( !mfn_valid(sh_ctxt->mfn2) )
- return ((mfn_x(sh_ctxt->mfn1) == BAD_GVA_TO_GFN) ?
+ return ((mfn_x(sh_ctxt->mfn2) == BAD_GVA_TO_GFN) ?
MAPPING_EXCEPTION : MAPPING_UNHANDLEABLE);
/* Cross-page writes mean probably not a pagetable */
sh_remove_shadows(v, sh_ctxt->mfn2, 0, 0 /* Slow, can fail */ );
Cheers,
Tim.
--
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, Citrix Systems (R&D) Ltd.
[Company #02300071, SL9 0DZ, UK.]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home