|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0: #372 - oneissue fi
Not really. I'd perhaps get Xen to dump information about all hvm_params and
acceleration options and see if anythign has been dropped across the
save/restore.
-- Keir
On 29/12/07 13:24, "Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On my host, for KernelBuild test, it may vary from 3% to 10%, but 30%
> was also observed on others' hosts.
>
> Any suggestion?
>
> Thanks
> -- Dexuan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keir Fraser
> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 5:20 PM
> To: You, Yongkang; xen-devel
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0: #372 -
> oneissue fixed
>
> On 29/12/07 06:40, "You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> 6) HVM domain performance would downgrade, after doing save/restore.
>
> How much does it downgrade by?
>
> -- Keir
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|