| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: relax signature check
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> If xen-32.0 should be compatible than wouldn't xen-24.0 be compatible
> too? I think the point was that you should either be checking for
> 'xen-3.x' or something more general that would accept anything >=
> xen-3.0.
The signature is supposed to be an ABI signature, so regardless of the
actual hypervisor version, it should always present "xen-3.0"
(presumably backwards compat if it also supports other versions of the
ABI). There was a bug in some versions where it puts the actual
hypervisor version in there, requiring this patch. Technically that
means that looking for "xen-3." is more accurate, but frankly not
important enough to bother raising a patch over.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home