Re: [Xen-devel] [FW: FYI: The plan for Xen kernels in Fedora 9]

["Chuck Short" <zulcss@xxxxxxxxx>]

I would appreciate the git tree and Im pretty sure that members of the
Ubuntu community would as well.

Thanks
chuck

On Dec 10, 2007 12:38 PM, Stephen C. Tweedie <sct@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 17:06 +0000, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
>
> > I just tidied up my current tree, and I've pushed patches to
> >
> >       http://people.redhat.com/sct/patches/dom0-pvops/2.6.24-rc4-A0/
>
> btw, I'm maintaining this myself as a local git repository, with two
> active branches: one working branch which I'll be rebasing regularly to
> keep it synced up and patched against Linus' latest tree, and which will
> be getting commits reordered and merged to keep things as a sane linear
> patch queue against Linus's tree; and a full-history branch, which
> contains all the history of the rebases for sanity checking.
>
> This setup works extremely well for me, but I'm not sure how useful it
> is for other folks.  Because it is regularly rebased, the active branch
> isn't useful as a git merge source; and because it keeps all the
> historical cruft that is being pruned from the active branch, the
> history branch isn't all that useful as a development base.
>
> But I'll push these to a public git repo if anybody is interested in
> using the tree in that form.  (Just as long as I can put up a big hazard
> warning about the dangers of using a git tree that loses history!)
>
>
> --Stephen
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel