WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH 2/2] Add hcall to probe Xen heap

To: "Subrahmanian, Raj" <raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH 2/2] Add hcall to probe Xen heap
From: Ryan Harper <ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:51:20 -0500
Cc: Ryan Harper <ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 08:49:37 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <94C8C9E8B25F564F95185BDA64AB05F60526F34D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20070606160715.GR31467@xxxxxxxxxx> <94C8C9E8B25F564F95185BDA64AB05F60526F34D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
* Subrahmanian, Raj <raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx> [2007-06-17 11:46]:
> Ryan,
> I applied these patches against 15200 and was able to boot on a 4-cell
> ES7000 with numa=on.
> Boots fine. I brought up a few VMs with some loads on them. That seems
> to work fine as well.

Great! Thanks for testing the patches out.

> Were there any other data points that you would like me to check out?
> 
> I was able to see the node info from xm info
> node_to_cpu            : node0:24-31
>                          node1:16-23
>                          node2:8-15
>                          node3:0-7

Yeah, in xm info, I'd like to see:

nr_cpus
nr_nodes
sockets_per_node
cores_per_socket
threads_per_core

I believe I've fixed up the sockets_per_node calculation, but the more
machines we test on the sooner we know for sure.

> 
> If you could give me an updated set of patches against the tip, we can
> run our weekly tests with numa=on.

As Keir mentioned, you can still test with numa=on without the patches.
The new patches cover how the topology is exposed to userspace.  In any
case, the latest versions are posted [1]here and [2]here.


1. http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-06/msg00298.html
2. http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-06/msg00299.html

-- 
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253   T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel