WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] Virtio draft III: example block driver

To: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] Virtio draft III: example block driver
From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 12:09:09 +0300
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kvm-devel <kvm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Borntraeger <cborntra@xxxxxxxxxx>, Latchesar Ionkov <lionkov@xxxxxxxx>, Suzanne McIntosh <skranjac@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 02:07:28 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1182154095.19064.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1181217762.14054.192.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1181999552.6237.255.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1181999669.6237.257.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1181999825.6237.260.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1181999920.6237.263.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46754451.2010305@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1182154095.19064.24.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419)
Rusty Russell wrote:
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 17:25 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Rusty Russell wrote:
+       /* Set up for reply. */
+       vblk->sg[0].page = virt_to_page(&vbr->in_hdr);
+       vblk->sg[0].offset = offset_in_page(&vbr->in_hdr);
+       vblk->sg[0].length = sizeof(vbr->in_hdr);
+       num = blk_rq_map_sg(q, vbr->req, vblk->sg+1);
+       vbr->out_hdr.id = vblk->vdev->ops->add_inbuf(vblk->vdev, vblk->sg,
+                                                    1+num, vbr);
+       if (IS_ERR_VALUE(vbr->out_hdr.id))
+               goto full;
+
+       vblk->sg[0].page = virt_to_page(&vbr->out_hdr);
+       vblk->sg[0].offset = offset_in_page(&vbr->out_hdr);
+       vblk->sg[0].length = sizeof(vbr->out_hdr);
+
+       vbr->out_id = vblk->vdev->ops->add_outbuf(vblk->vdev, vblk->sg, 1,
+                                                 vbr);
This strikes me as wasteful. Why not set up a single descriptor which contains both placement and the data itself?

We could actually do this for write, but not for read (where the length
& sector need to be sent to other end, and the data comes from other
end).


So you map the first sg entry for output, and the rest for input.

Less pretty, but more efficient.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>