|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups
Hi, Mike
Then I have a question.
When your scheduler patch effects performance improvement?
(like improvement of various latency for Driver Domain etc.)
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
"Mike D. Day" <ncmike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/05/07 09:06 +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
> >Hi, Mike
> >
> >I have one question about this issue.
> >Is there any performance improvement results are available?
> >
> >Thanks
> >Atsushi SAKAI
>
> Sakai,
>
> I will perform some micro benchmarks with the patch and without, and
> with grouped domains and no groups.
>
> I expect there will be no performance benefit and no detriment.
>
> Mike
>
> --
> Mike D. Day
> IBM LTC
> Cell: 919 412-3900
> Sametime: ncmike@xxxxxxxxxx AIM: ncmikeday Yahoo: ultra.runner
> PGP key: http://www.ncultra.org/ncmike/pubkey.asc
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Atsushi SAKAI
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups,
Atsushi SAKAI <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Ian Pratt
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Chris
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Mike D. Day
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Chris
- [Xen-devel] Re: 0/4 Xen Scheduling Groups, Atsushi SAKAI
|
|
|
|
|