|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP
* Daniel Stodden <stodden@xxxxxxxxxx> [2007-03-22 11:25]:
> On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 11:01 -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
>
> > > i see. not like i'm too deep in the srat, but methinks there may be sane
> > > default values to be generated from the srat. any work happening or
> > > having happened on that front?
> >
> > Xen understands the topology but does not make any direct use of the
> > information in either the initial placement of VCPUs for the guest, nor
> > in the scheduler when making migration decisions. I'm not aware of any
> > work to address that at the moment.
>
> thanks. do you continue work on xen and numa, or proceed elsewhere?
I continue to work on xen and keep and eye on the NUMA support.
--
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
(512) 838-9253 T/L: 678-9253
ryanh@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, tgh
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, tgh
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Daniel Stodden
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP,
Ryan Harper <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, tgh
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Petersson, Mats
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, tgh
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NUMA and SMP, Ryan Harper
- [Xen-devel] The context switch overhead comparison between vmexit/vmentry and hypercall., Liang Yang
|
|
|
|
|