WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix for missing response to XS_UNWATCH request.

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix for missing response to XS_UNWATCH request.
From: Magnus Carlsson <magnus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:31:40 -0700
Delivery-date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:30:43 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070303)
With this patch, Dom0 clients can do "unwatch" properly through the
kernel's xenbus connection.

Cheers,
Magnus
# HG changeset patch
# User Magnus Carlsson <magnus@xxxxxxxxxx>
# Date 1174512701 25200
# Node ID 001a9729e8f7a6c0da128a7f9586f9a304e17cab
# Parent  3fd9b0c71b8c687b108a8bf671c9c4fc47046a0a
Fix for missing response to XS_UNWATCH request.

diff -r 3fd9b0c71b8c -r 001a9729e8f7 
linux-2.6-xen-sparse/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev.c
--- a/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev.c      Tue Mar 20 
17:36:18 2007 +0000
+++ b/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_dev.c      Wed Mar 21 
14:31:41 2007 -0700
@@ -246,9 +246,6 @@ static ssize_t xenbus_dev_write(struct f
                token++;
 
                if (msg_type == XS_WATCH) {
-                       static const char * XS_WATCH_RESP = "OK";
-                       struct xsd_sockmsg hdr;
-
                        watch = kmalloc(sizeof(*watch), GFP_KERNEL);
                        watch->watch.node = kmalloc(strlen(path)+1,
                                                     GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -266,11 +263,6 @@ static ssize_t xenbus_dev_write(struct f
                        }
                        
                        list_add(&watch->list, &u->watches);
-
-                       hdr.type = XS_WATCH;
-                       hdr.len = strlen(XS_WATCH_RESP) + 1;
-                       queue_reply(u, (char *)&hdr, sizeof(hdr));
-                       queue_reply(u, (char *)XS_WATCH_RESP, hdr.len);
                } else {
                        list_for_each_entry_safe(watch, tmp_watch,
                                                  &u->watches, list) {
@@ -284,6 +276,14 @@ static ssize_t xenbus_dev_write(struct f
                                }
                        }
                }
+               {
+                       static const char * XS_RESP = "OK";
+                       struct xsd_sockmsg hdr;
+                       hdr.type = msg_type;
+                       hdr.len = strlen(XS_RESP) + 1;
+                       queue_reply(u, (char *)&hdr, sizeof(hdr));
+                       queue_reply(u, (char *)XS_RESP, hdr.len);
+               }
 
                break;
 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix for missing response to XS_UNWATCH request., Magnus Carlsson <=