| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: /dev/mem and /dev/kmem
On 21/3/07 12:35, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So how about applications which simply use /dev/mem to map
> normal domain memory? Seems this breaks compatibility
> in user level though desired for above Xserver case... Or such
> case is rare?
This case seems not to occur in practise (no complaints so far and our
/dev/mem has had this limitation since day one). This is perhaps not
surprising: really not much good can come out of direct grokking of
kernel-maintained memory without the kernel's knowledge.
> BTW, I didn't find code to protect Xen to be mapped in this path,
> like in get_page_from_l1e(). Could you help pointing out?
Not sure how you mean. Only pages that explicitly are owned by a domain and
have a non-zero refcount can have get_page() succeed on them. So random
Xen-owned pages are safe.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home