 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Clean up vmx_io_instruction()
| To: | "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] Clean up vmx_io_instruction() |
| From: | Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:13:54 +0000 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2007 03:12:49 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Your message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:44:05 +0800." <3E68BD4534D7FC4995E20ECE949EA0C7010C5F84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
> vmx_io_instruction() is too long, the attached patch cleans up it. Then it's strange that the attached patch adds more lines than it removes. :-) It's a big set of changes so I'm not inclined to take them before 3.0.5 unless there is a good reason. Is there one? -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: /dev/mem and /dev/kmem, Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Move MEMZONE_XEN to the last, Jan Beulich |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [Patch] Clean up vmx_io_instruction(), Han, Weidong |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen cpu Scheduling, pak333 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
