Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] dump-core: store .xen_p2m or .xen_pfn se

Isaku Yamahata wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 09:59:40AM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> > On 9/3/07 01:52, "Isaku Yamahata" <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > dump-core: store .xen_p2m or .xen_pfn section in pfn ascending order.
> > > So far the order isn't specified and may be random in theory.
> > > But sorted array is requested by crash utility for efficient looking up.
> > > Fortunately it is the case except ia64 full virtualized domain.
> > > Update document such that those array must be sorted and fix the ia64
> > > full virtualized domain case.
> >
> > Put the qsort() in the ia64 code if it's needed at all.
>
> Moved.
>
> > But shouldn't it be
> > easy to generate the memory-area list in order in the first place?
>
> Dave, do you have any opinion?
>

Nope -- pfn-ascending order in the two arrays is all I'm requesting...

Thanks,
  Dave



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] smp booting query, Pradeep Singh, TLS-Chennai

Next by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] smp booting query, Petersson, Mats

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] dump-core: store .xen_p2m or .xen_pfn section in pfn ascending order., Keir Fraser

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [Xen-API] make VTPM.destroy return void upon success, Ewan Mellor

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]