 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] VCPU affinity
| To: | "Ky Srinivasan" <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] VCPU affinity |
| From: | Emmanuel Ackaouy <ackaouy@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:01:45 +0100 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 19 Dec 2006 03:11:25 -0800 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=DJXywhkdcG1dxF8pW0vxoPfu5IryWUN+ZF4uat5PawN6y0wUqeJvD1fc3k8whMijgtvEVwc/YpUG9p+lP3rDJvg/AIlNf3namiZ703LeodBl0PtIf3cWsRMMKOMAFYL6asBE1VdX3TTSJFA7HXyHBaypiyOpNmLBmuQZw4wWvxU= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4586644F.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <4586644F.E57C.0030.0@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Dec 18, 2006, at 16:56, Ky Srinivasan wrote: What is the best way to pin VCPUs. It looks like the implementation of affinity currently is at best only "soft".Regards, VCPU affinity should not be soft. By the time the set affinity hypercall returns, the VCPU in question should be running on a physical CPU set in its affinity mask. If it's not behaving this way then something is broken. Can you send more details? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: What is more secure? HVM or PV ?, David Pilger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Fwd: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] bt878 based dvr card vs. pci pass-thru], Sipos Ferenc |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] VCPU affinity, Ky Srinivasan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] VCPU affinity, Ky Srinivasan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
