| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Move RTC from Qemu to HV
|
To: |
"Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>, "Yang, Xiaowei" <xiaowei.yang@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Move RTC from Qemu to HV |
|
From: |
"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:27:36 +0800 |
|
Cc: |
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 29 Sep 2006 00:28:15 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Thread-index: |
AcbhfSgZ1zf5Dd22R7mr0rlT/3BpdwAA4+OPACIANVAAAopMNgA83y+AACC9oRAAAyPA8QAAklJw |
|
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Move RTC from Qemu to HV |
Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 29/9/06 6:43 am, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Keir, how about using the attached patch as workaround for xen 3.0.3.
>> With it 64 bit win2003 UP and SMP can work fine, 64bit SMP can go
>> hct stress for 20 hours.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Rotfl. No. HVM guests would sleep no longer than 16us!
>
> We'll get the proper patch in asap.
>
> -- Keir
>
Keir:
The proper patch is either to move RTC into hypervisor or modify
DM IRQ injection mechanism. I'd prefer to take the prior solution while
your concern is righ too as we are in RC1 now and want this size of
patch. For the later one, the change is much tricky and it may introduce
some regression issue and big imapct to other architecture like IA-64.
So, what is your tradeoff now? We must fix this kind of bug,
right?
Thx,
Eddie
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Move RTC from Qemu to HV, Yang, Xiaowei
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Move RTC from Qemu to HV, Yang, Xiaowei
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Move RTC from Qemu to HV, Yang, Xiaowei
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Move RTC from Qemu to HV, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Move RTC from Qemu to HV, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Move RTC from Qemu to HV,
Dong, Eddie <=
|
|
|
| |
|
Home