|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit	XENunstable c/
 
On 27/9/06 13:30, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 11626 has a possible fix for this and at least will print out
>> some more info
>> (even on production builds ;-) if the MSR_EFER write fails.
>> 
> 
> Can't understand your patch, can you explain more?
> And why it's a possible fix?
long_mode_do_msr_write() was not taking just the low 32 bits of EAX to form
the 64-bit MSR value. If the high 32 bits of RAX had garbage then this would
lead to garbage in the MSR value.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- RE: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XENunstable	c/s 11616, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XENunstable	c/s 11616, Li, Xin B
- Re: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit	XENunstable c/s 11616,
Keir Fraser <=
 
 
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XENunstable	c/s 11616, Li, Xin B
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XENunstable	c/s 11616, Li, Xin B
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XENunstable	c/s 11616, Li, Xin B
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XENunstable	c/s 11616, Li, Xin B
 
  
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |