|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XENunstable c/
On 27/9/06 13:30, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 11626 has a possible fix for this and at least will print out
>> some more info
>> (even on production builds ;-) if the MSR_EFER write fails.
>>
>
> Can't understand your patch, can you explain more?
> And why it's a possible fix?
long_mode_do_msr_write() was not taking just the low 32 bits of EAX to form
the 64-bit MSR value. If the high 32 bits of RAX had garbage then this would
lead to garbage in the MSR value.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XENunstable c/s 11616, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XENunstable c/s 11616, Li, Xin B
- Re: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XENunstable c/s 11616,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XENunstable c/s 11616, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XENunstable c/s 11616, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XENunstable c/s 11616, Li, Xin B
- RE: [Xen-devel] Testing status of HVM (Intel VT) on 64bit XENunstable c/s 11616, Li, Xin B
|
|
|
|
|