WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Kernel error with todays -unstable.

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Kernel error with todays -unstable.
From: Matt Ayres <matta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:36:08 -0400
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 07:36:45 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C1389FC7.17D9%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: TekTonic
References: <C1389FC7.17D9%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
Keir,

Have you any update on this bug I would label as _CRITICAL_ seeing as the same hardware, config file, and 2.6.16.13 worked just fine. Even the newer hypervisor and 2.6.16.13 from previous -unstable tree boots fine.

Thanks,
Matt

Keir Fraser wrote:


On 21/9/06 19:52, "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Got this changing from  2.6.16.13 to 2.6.16.29.. running .13 under the
same xen binary works fine.
Is the Xen binary built from a recent repository (i.e., which includes
2.6.16.29), or an older Xen version? It shouldn't matter, but if you run
2.6.16.29 okay with latest Xen but not with older Xen then it probably
indicates a compatibility issue that we should look into.

Ok, actually the logs you posted are sufficient to see that the Xen and
Linux are a 'matched pair'. So... Did you modify the Linux config at all?

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel