WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [Xense-devel][RFC][PATCH][0/4] Xen Security Modules: Int

To: "George S. Coker, II" <gscoker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Xen Developers" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [Xense-devel][RFC][PATCH][0/4] Xen Security Modules: Intro
From: "Jun Koi" <junkoi2004@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 02:42:12 +0900
Delivery-date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:42:38 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DP04GIoT9G4BjH13RVz/iNxEVAEHn+gh+YAP49OnMndtjrinTtMelCZOKCJnrV4EqAcvCGVxUvpmCygiy7y8VzAcyB3G1HXvB8J4XIPcQZXsRADD6lCEJWVlW7ww046gSXeiew7s1ztIEqKoe6U5nARfNdMm2vaTK9R8r7m+qCM=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <fdaac4d50609011036j116cc28cv9a39476702b23585@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1157129851.22006.187.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fdaac4d50609011036j116cc28cv9a39476702b23585@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 9/2/06, Jun Koi <junkoi2004@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi George,

Awesome, you guys have done a great job!!!

Few questions:

- So we can use XMS instead of ACM, thus we can remove ACM in the
future? (same as LSM, which seems to monopoly the security policy of
Linux? )

Of course here I meant SELinux monopolies the Linux kernel, not LSM subsystem :)

Thanks.
Jun

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel