Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds

[David F Barrera <dfbp@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> I see PAE is still broken with >4GB (SMP) (on 10363), is that the reason
> you did not include the test results for PAE?
>   
Actually, no. We are still ironing out some kinks in our automation, 
which has prevented me from testing PAE.
> Jun
> ---
> Intel Open Source Technology Center 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David F
> Barrera
> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 11:07 AM
> To: xen-devel
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
>
> June 16, 2006, using xen-unstable changeset:
>
> changeset:   10359:231e07e22f9c
> tag:         tip
> user:        kaf24@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> date:        Fri Jun 16 04:52:49 2006 +0100
> summary:     [LINUX] Export new gnttab_cancel_free_callback() to
> modules.
>
> x86_32 (no PAE support)
>
> * SLES 9 SP2 and FC4 on IBM xSeries 335(512MB RAM)and IBM HS20 Blades
> 8843 41U)
> * Builds and boots without problems
> * Ran xm-test on all boxes
>
> ISSUES:
> * Bugzilla Bug 677 - xm-test failure: REASON: [Errno 5] Input/output
> error
>
> ISSUES:
>
> x86_64 (SLES 9 SP2 IBM HS20 Blades 8843 41U)
>
> * Builds and boots without problems
> * Ran xm-test on all boxes
>
> ISSUES:
>
> XM-TEST Results:
>             Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL |
> ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+
>  hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 |  107 |   10 |     0 |     3 |
>    hs20.rhel4-x86_32 |   70 |   47*|     0 |     3 |
>              x335fc4 |   90 |   27*|     0 |     3 |
>            x335sles9 |   71 |   45*|     0 |     3 |
>
> * Problem in xm-test
>
>   
--

Regards,

David F Barrera
Linux Technology Center
Systems and Technology Group, IBM

"The wisest men follow their own direction. "
        
                         Euripides



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel