|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] evtchn_upcall_mask
* Hollis Blanchard (hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> So I'd like to abstract users of evtchn_upcall_mask in Xen (and Linux,
> mini-os, etc) into set/get accessors. On PPC and IA64, the accessors
> would deal directly with the register state, and the field itself
> wouldn't even exist.
Is local_irq_disable() not enough abstraction in Linux? Oh, I see,
you mean for both sides of the fence. From your description that makes
perfect sense to me.
thanks,
-chris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|