[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] Run the Mini-OS application in its o

"Jacob Gorm Hansen" <jacobg@xxxxxxx> writes:

> I can, when writing a boot-loader there is no need for multiple
> threads, so I would like the option of not having to start (and clean
> up after) any.

I see.

> Perhaps the last part of start_kernel() could be moved to a weak
> function, that people like me can override?

I suggest we simply just leave kernel.c the way it is, and my patch be
ignored. 

John

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] Run the Mini-OS application in its own thread., John D. Ramsdell [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] Run the Mini-OS application in its own thread., Jacob Gorm Hansen [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] Run the Mini-OS application in its own thread., John D. Ramsdell <=

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] Run the Mini-OS application in its own thread., Jacob Gorm Hansen

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] RE: Rearchitecting IO Emulation for HVM Guests, Ian Pratt

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] Run the Mini-OS application in its own thread., Jacob Gorm Hansen

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] RE: Rearchitecting IO Emulation for HVM Guests, Ian Pratt

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] Run the Mini-OS application in its own threa