 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/9] Linux support for vdevice bus
| To: | "Rusty Russell" <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/9] Linux support for vdevice bus |
| From: | "Jacob Gorm Hansen" <jacobg@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:09:02 +0200 |
| Cc: | Xen Mailing List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 07 Jun 2006 04:09:28 -0700 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=OnYjEwKcllVjwO6Wa5VwRsRhKhUWqbGiNo7aQfaRtlv55JpEHKwRbBWschtqlHV5RhNQSyOmN365dMlOJob7a1sJVa4rmos/Inq5a+0UBS7XzjPlxkQiKsE2KB6KKqT7enX9ZaLj6m/slCLHnCpm3Tb8GrOxMJV6XWNNG2UWM5U= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1149677938.5183.284.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <1149572143.5183.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1149573287.5183.41.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <e08041f30606070303r7a679ce1t80d65c5b84a9e4a5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1149677938.5183.284.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 6/7/06, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: So if we really want all the action to happen on restore, I think we need a stop!() function for drivers called before interrupts are re-enabled, and then we can call restart() later at our leisure. The driver, other than ensuring that "stop" can be called with interrupts off, doesn't have to know whether it's called during save or restore. Seem reasonable? Yes, that sounds fine to me. Jacob _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/9] Linux support for vdevice bus, Rusty Russell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVMLOADER][DISCUSS] 8 way default rombios, Woller, Thomas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/9] Linux support for vdevice bus, Rusty Russell |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/9] vdevice tool for manipulating vdevice bus, Rusty Russell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
