[Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [X86EMUL] Mark MO

To:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-changelog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [X86EMUL] Mark MOV instruction as not needing writeback.
From:	"Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 6 Jun 2006 20:53:12 +0200
Delivery-date:	Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:53:54 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<E1FnWsC-00063S-By@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcaJbGse1kW8C5sLTeeyunMfbwYUQQALeYbw
Thread-topic:	[Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [X86EMUL] Mark MOV instruction as not needing writeback.

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-changelog-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-changelog-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> Of Xen patchbot-unstable
> Sent: 06 June 2006 09:25
> To: xen-changelog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [X86EMUL] Mark MOV 
> instruction as not needing writeback.
> 
> # HG changeset patch
> # User kfraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> # Node ID 89d7acdd8951342c1d75a5485f732f8164e5ccb1
> # Parent  5e3827f7a93a96a1d043cb0e523a0f821830af94
> [X86EMUL] Mark MOV instruction as not needing writeback.
[snip]
>  2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>      /* 0x88 - 0x8F */
> -    ByteOp|DstMem|SrcReg|ModRM, DstMem|SrcReg|ModRM,
> -    ByteOp|DstReg|SrcMem|ModRM, DstReg|SrcMem|ModRM,
> +    ByteOp|DstMem|SrcReg|ModRM|Mov, DstMem|SrcReg|ModRM|Mov,
> +    ByteOp|DstReg|SrcMem|ModRM|Mov, DstReg|SrcMem|ModRM|Mov,
>      0, 0, 0, DstMem|SrcNone|ModRM|Mov,
>      /* 0x90 - 0x9F */
>      0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,

Doesn't the same thing need to be done for 0xC6/0xC7?

--
Mats


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] RE: [Xen-changelog] [xen-unstable] [X86EMUL] Mark MOV instru